Daily Independent (Ashland, KY)

Local News

February 18, 2008

Motorcycle suit moved to federal court

ASHLAND — A lawsuit filed last month by a group of motorcycle owners that claim their bikes were illegally seized by the Kentucky State Police as part of a criminal investigation has been moved from state to federal court.

An order was entered recently transferring the case from Boyd Circuit Court to U.S. District Court in Ashland.

The main reason the case was transferred is it involves questions of whether the plaintiffs’ Constitutional rights were violated, said Catlettsburg attorney Garis Pruitt, who filed the suit on behalf of the motorcycle owners.

In the state court complaint, the three name plaintiffs, Mark Justice, Terry Elliott and Pete Withrow, all of Ashland, claimed their cycles were among about 45 seized from owners in and around Boyd County last summer by the KSP and FBI.

Each of the seizures was done “without a warrant and without court permission” and were outside the scope of the KSP’s statutory authority, the complaint alleged.

The suit names as defendants the KSP and William Riley, a detective with the agency’s Lexington-based Special Investigations Section.

In its response to the suit, the KSP acknowledged seizing the bikes and it continues to hold them. However, the agency denies the vehicles were wrongly taken from their owners and maintains it acted within the scope of Kentucky law.

The KSP also states the cycles were seized “in conjunction with a joint interstate criminal investigation” with the FBI.

In an amended complaint filed in federal court, Pruitt maintains that by seizing the motorcycles without warrants and without giving the owners the opportunity to contest the seizures, the KSP violated the owners’ rights to due process of law under the Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.

Also, Pruitt argues the state law the KSP cites to justify the warrantless seizures “is unconstitutional both on its face and so applied.” Similar laws permitting warrantless seizures of private property based solely on police officers’ beliefs have been struck down as unconstitutional in other states, the complaint states.

The suit was filed in federal court on behalf of the three named plaintiffs and “42 others similarly situated.” Court records also indicate Justice is no longer part of the case.

KENNETH HART can be reached at khart@dailyindependent.com or (606) 326-2654.

Text Only
Local News
Featured Ads
Seasonal Content
AP Video
No Limits for Disabled Hunters at Mich. Base Victim Identified in Fla. Face-chewing Attack Radioactive Bluefin Tuna Crossed the Pacific 90 Guns Seized, Dozens Arrested in Oakland Raw Video: Hail Storm Batters Oklahoma City 6-Year-Old Going to National Spelling Bee California's Foie Gras Ban About to Begin Video Essay: Funky Winkerbean Comic Turns 40 Hurricane Andrew Remembered, 20 Years Later Judge's Ruling Halts Tenn. Mosque Construction Romney in Las Vegas on Texas Primary Day Sister Says She Reported Brother in Patz Killing Even Fla. Police Shocked by Face-Mauling Attack Angry Birds Spreading Their Wings Witness Describes Fla. Face-chewing Attack
Community Calendar
Loading…
Events by eviesays.com
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Popular Searches
Powered by Local.com
SEC Zone